The Project
![]() |
Site Map |
The Purpose and Content
My main goal in the creation of this website was to quickly, effectively, and somewhat charmingly communicate the services offered at Upland Hills. The content, which includes information about the farm’s services, activities, and facilities, was to be reworked in the form of a “traditional” website (as opposed to a blog or digital story, which didn’t seem as appropriate for this business). There was a lot of information sort through, and their current website offers little in the way of organization. I started by creating a sitemap to categorize the content, which would serve as my own road map for creating pages and subpages. This map guided me, but not surprisingly the final structure looks a little different than it did in my initial plan.
My Dissatisfaction with the Structure
![]() |
Too many unnecessary options |
The structure is the one area I feel dissatisfied with. It seems that there are too many pages for things that could probably all fit onto one page on one clean canvass. For example, under “Kids & Family” there are three drop-down options. One of them is “Storybook Trail” which leads the user to a pretty ugly page with very little information on it. This information would’ve been easier to find and better looking if grouped with the rest of the “Kids & Family” content.
The Audience and Tone
The audience for this site is the people who live in and around the Oxford, MI area and don’t know about Upland Hills. Or maybe they do know, but they’re looking for more information about it or one of its services. In short, I wrote for typical the Midwesterner simply seeking information about Upland Hills.
My Satisfaction with the Audience-Aware Writing
The writing for this audience is something that I believe was done successfully. After many drafts of many posts and pages, and a few slaps of my own forehead, I still struggle to carve out all the deadwood to leave behind perfectly lean writing. However, I'm confident that the writing—if not always as tight as possible—definitely hits the right tone for the audience. Once piece in particular I feel proud of is this intro I wrote for the homepage:
“We are 240 acres of family-owned farmland and animals. Nice
to meetchya.”
I think this is easily-digestible,
informational, and friendly. And it’s only 13 words. The tone is
inviting and shows personality without adding too much deadwood. If I found this website and read those two sentences, I would have a pretty good sense of what this business is about, and I’d feel invited to continue exploring the site.
inviting and shows personality without adding too much deadwood. If I found this website and read those two sentences, I would have a pretty good sense of what this business is about, and I’d feel invited to continue exploring the site.
Final Reflections
I’d like to add that
everything I learned and everything I’m currently dissatisfied with in the Wordpress version of the Upland Hills website will inform this version of the Upland Hills website
that I’m currently designing and developing myself. It’s not finished yet, but hopefully you can
already see the differences between the Wordpress site and
this. I will be refining the structure and navigation and executing a much more
original, professional design. This is the site I'll present to Upland Hills
Farm, in the hopes that they’ll want to use this instead of their current site.
Overall, this project
was shockingly difficult for me. To be frank, I left the first class thinking
to myself This is going to be a walk in the park. But I was totally unprepared
to, as Jeff put it, “unlearn” much of what I was taught about writing. While there’s
still a lot to learn and practice, I feel much more confident in writing for
the web after grappling with the beast that is the Upland Hills website.
Summary
Embarassing

- Visually cluttered, nonsensical, and ugly
- Way too verbose
- Not responsive (isn't easy to use on tablets and mobile devices)
- Unorganized navigation
- Not audience directed
Decent
- Tighter and cleaner graphics, yet still not quite balanced in all areas, and looks like it began from a template
- Leaner writing
- Usually responsive though has been dysfunctional in some tests (theme issues)
- Navigation is more logical, yet still more complicated than it needs to be
- Very audience directed
Professional, so far...
- Beautiful, original graphics and photography (if I do say so myself)
- Lean writing
- Fully responsive
- Simple, clean navigation
- Very audience directed
- BUT...it's not done yet (as you may notice in some of the effects and links).